{"accessLevel": "public", "bureauCode": ["020:00"], "contactPoint": {"fn": "Asja Korajkic", "hasEmail": "mailto:korajkic.asja@epa.gov"}, "description": "Coliphage are alternative fecal indicators that may be suitable surrogates for viral pathogens, but a majority of standard detection methods utilize insufficient sample volumes (1-100 mL) for routine detection in environmental waters. Here we compare three somatic and F+ coliphage enumeration methods based on a paired measurement from 1L samples collected from the Great Lakes region (n=74). Methods include: 1) a dead-end hollow fiber ultrafilter combined with single agar layer plaque assay (D-HFUF-SAL); 2) a modified SAL (M-SAL); and 3) a direct membrane filtration (DMF) technique. Overall, D-HFUF-SAL outperformed all other methods as it yielded the lowest frequency of non-detects [(ND); 10.8%] and the highest average coliphage concentrations (2.51 \u00b1 1.02 log10 plaque forming unit/liter (PFU/L) and 0.79 \u00b1 0.71 log10 PFU/L for somatic and F+, respectively). M-SAL yielded 29.7% ND and average concentrations of 2.26 \u00b1 1.15 log10 PFU/L (somatic) and 0.59 \u00b1 0.82 log10 PFU/L (F+). DMF performed worse compared to D-HFUF-SAL and M-SAL methods (ND of 65.6%; average somatic coliphage concentration 1.52 \u00b1 1.32 log10 PFU/L, with no F+ detected), indicating this procedure is unsuitable for 1L surface water sample volumes. This study represents an important step toward the use of a coliphage method for recreational water quality criteria purposes. \n\nThis dataset is associated with the following publication:\nMcMinn, B., E. Rhodes, E. Huff, P. Wanjugi, M. Ware, S. Nappier, M. Cyterski, O. Shanks, K. Oshima, and A. Korajkic. Comparison of somatic and F+ coliphage enumeration methods with large volume surface water samples.   JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS. Elsevier Science Ltd, New York, NY, USA, 261: 63-66, (2018).", "distribution": [{"downloadURL": "https://pasteur.epa.gov/uploads/10.23719/1434005/ScienceHub.xlsx", "mediaType": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet", "title": "ScienceHub.xlsx"}], "identifier": "https://doi.org/10.23719/1434005", "keyword": ["coliphage", "culture-based methods", "method comparison"], "license": "https://pasteur.epa.gov/license/sciencehub-license.html", "modified": "2018-04-23", "programCode": ["020:000"], "publisher": {"name": "U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD)", "subOrganizationOf": {"name": "U.S. Environmental Protection Agency", "subOrganizationOf": {"name": "U.S. Government"}}}, "references": ["https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.08.007"], "rights": null, "title": "Method Comparison Manuscript"}