{"accessLevel": "public", "bureauCode": ["010:12"], "contactPoint": {"@type": "vcard:Contact", "fn": "Jordan S. Read", "hasEmail": "mailto:jread@usgs.gov"}, "description": "Multiple modeling frameworks were used to predict daily temperatures at 0.5m depth intervals for a set of diverse lakes in the U.S. states of Minnesota and Wisconsin. General Lake Model verion 2 process-Based (PB) models were configured and calibrated with training data to reduce root-mean squared error for 449 lakes (PBALL). Uncalibrated models used default configurations (PB0; see Winslow et al. 2016 for details) and no parameters were adjusted according to model fit with observations for 7,150 lakes.", "distribution": [{"@type": "dcat:Distribution", "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P9CA6XP8", "description": "Landing page for access to the data", "format": "XML", "mediaType": "application/http", "title": "Digital Data"}, {"@type": "dcat:Distribution", "description": "The metadata original format", "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5db819a8e4b0b0c58b5a4c45.xml", "format": "XML", "mediaType": "text/xml", "title": "Original Metadata"}], "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5db819a8e4b0b0c58b5a4c45", "keyword": ["inlandWaters", "Michigan", "United States", "Ohio", "Indiana", "Iowa", "North Dakota", "climate change", "Nebraska", "Wisconsin", "Illinois", "NE", "ND", "MI", "environment", "Missouri", "US", "MN", "IL", "MO", "IN", "USGS:5db819a8e4b0b0c58b5a4c45", "reservoirs", "water resources", "Minnesota", "South Dakota", "temperature", "SD", "modeling", "WI", "hybrid modeling", "thermal profiles", "water", "OH", "IA", "temperate lakes"], "modified": "2021-07-27T00:00:00Z", "publisher": {"@type": "org:Organization", "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"}, "spatial": "-104.016631682319, 37.1076610090681, -83.0716153148296, 49.3749961973185", "theme": ["geospatial"], "title": "Process-based water temperature predictions in the Midwest US: 5 Model prediction data"}