Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to content

Try the next-generation Data Catalog at catalog-beta.data.gov and help shape it with your feedback.

Data and code from: Cotton stalk management and a cover crop produce minimal effects on cotton leafroll dwarf virus

Metadata Updated: April 1, 2026

In 2017, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leafroll dwarf virus (CLRDV) was first reported in the United States. One CLRDV inoculum source includes the previous year’s cotton stalks, hence destroying cotton stalks could be effective for CLRDV management. However, tillage intensive stalk destruction methods (SDMs) can degrade southeastern soils, but a cover crop may provide short-term benefits and reduce CLRDV incidence. Therefore, we examined three SDMs (Tillage, Pull, Mow) across two cover crop levels [no cover and rye (Secale cereale L.) /clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.) mixture] and two cotton varieties to determine how cotton growth, soil penetration resistance (PR), and two CLRDV incidence sample times (pre-harvest and post-harvest) were affected across six environments during the 2021 and 2022 growing seasons. None of the SDMs affected any factors examined in this experiment, except soil PR and cotton yield. The Pull and Mow SDMs both increased soil PR compared to the Tillage SDM. An 8% yield increase (Pull > Mow) was observed, but the Tillage SDM yield did not differ from Pull or Mow SDMs. The rye/clover mixture also increased soil PR. Although cotton stands were 15% greater with no cover crop, subsequent cotton yield and fiber quality were minimally affected by cover crops. The rye/clover mixture increased post-harvest CLRDV incidence, and cotton yields were equal between cover crops. Pre-harvest CLRDV incidence probability was 0.23, but post-harvest CLRDV incidence probability was 0.71. Continuing to identify and evaluate cultural practices that reduce CLRDV incidence is imperative to prevent negative impacts.

This dataset contains all data and code required to reproduce the analyses, tables, and figures in the associated manuscript. A list of R packages used to create the aforementioned items can be found in the associated manuscript.

Access & Use Information

Public: This dataset is intended for public access and use. License: us-pd

Downloads & Resources

Dates

Metadata Created Date January 1, 2025
Metadata Updated Date April 1, 2026
Data Update Frequency irregular

Metadata Source

Harvested from USDA JSON

Additional Metadata

Resource Type Dataset
Metadata Created Date January 1, 2025
Metadata Updated Date April 1, 2026
Publisher Agricultural Research Service
Maintainer
Identifier 10.15482/USDA.ADC/25783143.v1
Data Last Modified 2026-03-25
Public Access Level public
Data Update Frequency irregular
Bureau Code 005:18
Metadata Context https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.jsonld
Schema Version https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
Catalog Describedby https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
Harvest Object Id f3f34f37-1be7-4998-a732-8a45e435ab38
Harvest Source Id d3fafa34-0cb9-48f1-ab1d-5b5fdc783806
Harvest Source Title USDA JSON
License https://www.usa.gov/publicdomain/label/1.0/
Old Spatial {"type": "MultiPoint", "coordinates": -85.88624, 32.429734, -85.890728, 32.426222, -87.879492, 30.536507, -87.880622, 30.540328, -85.310212, 31.377159, -85.309198, 31.377264}
Program Code 005:040
Source Datajson Identifier True
Source Hash c1bd29065bb62f020790356fcd5f6e10f07d40e25a26b6a0efa01196e1a6b605
Source Schema Version 1.1
Spatial {"type": "MultiPoint", "coordinates": -85.88624, 32.429734, -85.890728, 32.426222, -87.879492, 30.536507, -87.880622, 30.540328, -85.310212, 31.377159, -85.309198, 31.377264}
Temporal 2020-11-03/2022-11-30

Didn't find what you're looking for? Suggest a dataset here.